Summer energy poverty (SEPOV) is an urgent and growing issue in Europe as climate change raises temperatures and makes extreme heat waves a regular occurrence. Heat brings significant public health, economic, and social challenges, particularly for vulnerable groups like low-income households, the elderly, and residents in energy-inefficient and poorly insulated homes.
Early findings suggest that those already likely to face “winter” energy poverty may struggle in the summer, and, for instance, “cooling” has been recognised as an essential energy service in the definition of EPOV in the Energy Efficiency Directive (EED). Data and evidence on the magnitude and extent of the phenomenon are, however, more fragmented. For example, Eurostat data (2012) revealed that nearly 19% of EU households struggle to stay cool in summer, and research has shown that heat waves are responsible for about 48,000 deaths annually in Europe. Adding to the problem, 75% of European buildings remain energy inefficient, as evidenced by the EU, and may, therefore, quickly overheat.
Only a handful of countries, like France or Spain, collect data on the number of people suffering from the heat and are implementing proactive policies. Most countries have overlooked SEPOV considerations as part of broader energy and climate frameworks, mostly for geographical or historical rea-sons.
Despite these oversights and gaps in evidence, recent EU policies, including the EED, the Energy Performance of Building Directive (EPBD), and the EU Climate Adaptation Strategy, partially recognise or address summer cooling needs – making the EU framework the stepping stone for further policies.
This report shows that more attention needs to be put on implementing the EU policy framework and building comprehensive solutions to address both immediate risks and build year-long resilience. Targeted implementation and better coordination of the policy streams and integration of SEPOV into national and local strategies are crucial. The findings underline the importance of embedding SEPOV into energy poverty and climate adaptation policies, ensuring marginalised populations are not left behind. For example, many countries, such as Finland and cities like Prague, already follow the concept of “just resilience” – the equivalent of “just transition” principles but for climate – in their adaptation strategies. Cities play a critical role, and local initiatives such as Paris’s urban cooling network, Athens’ Chief Heat Officer, and Am-sterdam’s green public housing demonstrate scalable solutions, but a cohesive EU-wide ap-proach is necessary.
You must be logged in to post a comment.