ASHRAE Position Document onInfectious Aerosols

Download the document.

The pathogens that cause infectious diseases are spread from a primary host to secondary hosts via several different routes. Some diseases are known to spread by infectious aerosols; for other diseases, the route of transmission is uncertain. The risk of pathogen spread, andtherefore the number of people exposed, can be affected both positively and negatively by the airflow patterns in a space and by heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning (HVAC) and local exhaust ventilation (LEV) systems. ASHRAE is the global leader and foremost source of technical and educational information on the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of these systems. Although the principles discussed in this position document apply primarily tobuildings, they may also be applicable to other occupancies, such as planes, trains, and automobiles.

ASHRAE will continue to support research that advances the knowledge base of indoor airmanagement strategies aimed to reduce occupant exposure to infectious aerosols. Chief
among these ventilation-related strategies are dilution, airflow patterns, pressurization,
temperature and humidity distribution and control, filtration, and other strategies such as ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI). While the exact level of ventilation effectiveness varies with local conditions and the pathogens involved, ASHRAE believes that these techniques, when properly applied, can reduce the risk of transmission of infectious diseases through aerosols. To better specify the levels of certainty behind ASHRAE’s policy positions stated herein, we have chosen to adopt the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) rubric for expressing the scientific certainty behind our recommendations (Burns et al. 2011). These levels of certainty, as adapted for this position document, are as follows:

Evidence Level Description
AStrongly recommend; good evidence
BRecommend; at least fair evidence
CNo recommendation for or against; balance of benefits and harms too close to justify a recommendation
DRecommend against; fair evidence is ineffective or the harm outweighs the benefit
EEvidence is insufficient to recommend for or against routinely; evidence is lacking or of poor quality; benefits and harms cannot be determined

ASHRAE’s position is that facilities of all types should follow, as a minimum, the latest published standards and guidelines and good engineering practice. ANSI/ASHRAE Standards 62.1 and 62.2 (ASHRAE 2019a, 2019b) include requirements for outdoor air ventilation in most residential and nonresidential spaces, and ANSI/ASHRAE/ASHE Standard 170 (ASHRAE 2017a) covers both outdoor and total air ventilation in healthcare facilities. Based on risk assessments or owner project requirements, designers of new and existing facilities could go beyond the minimum requirements of these standards, using techniques covered in various ASHRAE publications, including the ASHRAE Handbook volumes, Research Project final reports, papers and articles, and design guides, to be even better prepared to control the dissemination of infectious aerosols.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.