Day: June 20, 2013

Little things, big problems: Invasives impacting culture

Watch the video at Great Lakes Echo.

Last year, the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative began producing a series of educational videos about invasive species in the Great Lakes for the National Park Service. New videos are being uploaded this spring, and you can watch the entire “Little Things, Big Problems” series here on Echo.

This video discusses how invasive species not only threaten the native plants and animals of the Great Lakes, and threaten the lifestyle of Native Americans living on Lake Superior.

Americans Buy Green to Save Money, Not the Climate

Read the full story in Mother Jones.

If you care about saving the climate, there’s good news and bad news this week, courtesy of a voluminous new report on Americans’ personal and consumer behavior in relation to global warming that’s just out from the Yale and George Mason research teams on climate change communication.

Obama Readying Emissions Limits on Power Plants

Read the full story in the New York Times.

The move would be the most consequential climate policy step he could take and one sure to provoke legal challenges from Republicans and some industries.

New GAO report on climate change

Climate Change: Various Adaptation Efforts Are Under Way at Key Natural Resource Management Agencies. GAO-13-253, May 31.
Highlights –

What GAO Found

Since 2007, the Forest Service, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the Fish and Wildlife Service, and the National Park Service have taken steps to establish strategic directions for addressing climate change adaptation. For example, the Forest Service developed a strategic framework document that established climate change adaptation as a central agency priority and another document, known as “the roadmap,” which identified actions that national forest managers were taking or could take to implement the direction outlined in the framework, including re-vegetating ecosystems that had been affected by fire with plant species that are better adapted to current and future climates. These four agencies have also developed guidance, training, and other tools for managers to use in adapting to climate change. For example, the National Park Service is developing guidance for park-based climate change adaptation plans that includes steps such as identifying conservation targets and conducting vulnerability assessments. The Bureau of Land Management has not established a strategic direction for addressing climate change impacts but is planning to develop a high-level climate change adaptation strategy by the end of the summer 2013. In addition, GAO visited one field location within each agency and found that managers at four of the five locations have taken steps to address climate change adaptation. For example:

  • Chugach National Forest managers have begun an assessment of the vulnerability to climate change of key resources to help set priorities and identify adaptation actions. For example, the vulnerability assessment will include information on how changes in climate are likely to affect snow cover and salmon populations, as well as an analysis of how these projected changes may affect residents in the region who rely on snow-based tourism and salmon for their livelihoods.
  • Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary managers are beginning to assess whether parts of their management plan should be revised to address climate change adaptation and have taken actions to protect marine resources, such as coral reefs, from climate change impacts. For example, the sanctuary is collaborating with local stakeholders to develop systems and techniques to grow coral and other reef species for replanting in depleted reef systems.

Managers at the Bureau of Land Management’s Kingman Resource Area, which manages its lands for livestock grazing and other uses, have not taken steps to address climate change adaptation and are awaiting agency direction.

The federal natural resource management agencies GAO reviewed are collaborating on climate change adaptation. For example, agencies are collaborating through landscape conservation cooperatives, comprising public and private organizations working to define shared goals and provide science for conservation planning, among other things. In addition, agencies have collaborated in developing national strategies for addressing climate change adaptation in the federal government. For example, the Fish and Wildlife Service, NOAA, and others collaborated on a strategy, released in March 2013, for addressing climate change adaptation in managing fish, wildlife, and plants.

Why GAO Did This Study

Climate change poses a variety of threats to federally managed natural resources, such as forests and wildlife, including possibly more frequent and severe droughts and wildfires. Adaptation–adjustments in natural or human systems to a new or changing environment that exploits beneficial opportunities or moderates negative effects–can be used to help manage the risks to vulnerable natural resources. GAO was asked to review federal agencies’ efforts to incorporate climate change adaptation into their natural resource planning and management since GAO last reported on this issue in 2007.

This report examines (1) steps key federal natural resource management agencies–Forest Service, NOAA, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service, and Bureau of Land Management–have taken since 2007 to address adaptation and (2) how these agencies have collaborated at the national level on adaptation since 2007. GAO analyzed the agencies’ climate change adaptation guidance and planning documents and interviewed agency officials. GAO also visited one field location for each agency, selected using a nonprobability approach, so the results are not generalizable to all of the agencies’ field locations.

GAO is not making any recommendations. GAO received written comments from the Department of Agriculture, which said the Forest Service agreed with the findings. GAO also received general and technical comments from the Departments of Commerce and the Interior, which were incorporated as appropriate.

For more information, contact Anne-Marie Fennell at (202) 512-3841 or

Announcing Pollution Prevention & Assistance Tracker (P2@), Version 3.2.7

The Northeast Waste Management Officials’ Association (NEWMOA) announces the release of “Pollution Prevention and Assistance Tracker,” or P2@, version 3.2.7.  This free software tool is designed to help pollution prevention and environmental assistance programs from state, local, county, and tribal governments, non-profits, and universities track their activities and the associated outcomes. It includes sections for tracking:

  • Work with individual clients (such as on-site visits, grants, awards, certifications, recognition, and research)
  • Educational and outreach materials
  • Workshops, conferences, and other training events
  • Responses to information requests
  • Sector-based, geographic-based, or others initiatives

P2@ (formerly called the Pollution Prevention and Compliance Assistance Metrics Database Software) enables programs to track the results associated with these activities, including changes in awareness and behavioral, environmental, and economic outcomes. Because each pollution prevention and assistance program is different, the software can be customized to best suit each program’s needs.

The recent upgrades to P2@ include:

  • A new section to help programs to track initiatives that involve a variety of assistance and P2 activities and bundle results for the entire initiative
  • A more user friendly interface that is easier to navigate and can be streamlined
  • Easier ways for programs to customize the database tool and allow them to eliminate sections that are not relevant for their program
  • Clearer indicators of required fields and smarter error handling
  • A new custom report that aggregates data according to the fields in the National P2 Results Data System so programs can use P2@ to collect data for reporting to P2 Results

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: