Connecticut Creates Mandate for Energy Efficient Homes

Read the full story in FutureStructure.

As area home builders and remodelers wrap up a successful 2015 construction season, already looming large for the 2016 season are coming revisions to Connecticut’s building codes that will have homeowners and contractors hitting the books on new requirements.

Builders say they expect the most significant changes will involve insulation and other aspects of energy efficiency.

Mark Kirk Keeps Them Guessing On Climate Stance

Read the full story in the National Journal.

After months of seesaw­ing on cli­mate change, Sen. Mark Kirk cast a ma­jor vote in fa­vor of en­vir­on­ment­al reg­u­la­tion Tues­day. But even still, en­vir­on­ment­al­ists are sus­pi­cious about wheth­er he’s really on their side.

Mixed message on weed-killer reflects reality of scientific uncertainty

Read the full story from Reuters.

Contradictory advice from two European-based agencies about the cancer risk posed by the weed-killer glyphosate offers clarity on only one message: that uncertainty is inherent in the scientific process.

Chemical Reform and Reporting: What’s Next?

Read the full story in Environmental Leader.

Using safer chemicals and improving chemical reporting has become a top priority for companies as the federal government moves closer to chemical reform legislation and consumers increasingly demand safer products and product transparency.

The last few years has seen retailers and manufactures including Target, Walmart and SC Johnson take steps to phase out hazardous chemicals in their products while the Retail Industry Leaders Association has rolled out an initiative designed to streamline the required safety data sheet process used by suppliers and retailers to exchange chemical and product information.

These companies are on the right track. Chemical reform and stricter reporting guidelines are well underway — and industry should prepare itself, say business and advocacy groups. Here’s what to expect in the upcoming months.

The state says it’s a power grab, but some Texas generators like Obama’s plan

Read the full story in the Houston Chronicle.

While it’s intuitive that wind and solar power companies, which don’t emit greenhouse gas in generating power, support the Clean Power Plan, opinion within the traditional electricity generation sector is more nuanced.

EPA Proposes to Reduce Smog-Forming Pollution Transported Across State Lines

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing updates to the agency’s Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) to address interstate air quality impacts for the 2008 ozone air quality standards. The proposed updates would reduce summertime emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NOx) from power plants that contribute to downwind ozone problems in the eastern half of the U.S.

“This update will help protect the health and lives of millions of Americans by reducing exposure to ozone pollution, which is linked to serious public health effects including reduced lung function, asthma, emergency room visits and hospital admissions, and early death from respiratory and cardiovascular causes,” said EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy. “The proposed updates support states’ obligation to address air pollution that is carried across state lines.”

The Clean Air Act’s “good neighbor” provision requires states – or, as a backstop, EPA – to address interstate transport of air pollution that affects the ability of downwind states to attain and maintain clean air standards. Under the “good neighbor” provision, states develop state implementation plans while EPA plays a backstop role by issuing federal implementation plans (FIPs) if a state fails to submit an approvable plan. Today’s proposal provides the FIP that would apply if EPA’s backstop obligation is triggered. States may choose to have their emissions sources controlled by the FIP rather than developing their own plan.

Specifically, the proposed updates identify cuts in power plant NOx emissions in 23 states in the eastern half of the country that contribute significantly to downwind ozone air quality problems and can be achieved using existing, proven and cost-effective control technologies. The proposed cuts in NOx emissions would lead to significant improvements in air quality for the 2017 ozone season. EPA is also proposing to adopt FIPs for each of the 23 states in the event that a state does not submit an approvable SIP.

EPA estimates that the proposed CSAPR Update Rule will reduce NOx emissions from power plants in the East by 85,000 tons in 2017 compared to projections without the rule. Due to this proposed rule and other changes already underway in the power sector, ozone season NOX emission will be 150,000 tons lower in 2017 than in 2014, a reduction of more than 30 percent. NOx emissions can react in the atmosphere to create ground-level ozone pollution, or smog. These pollutants can travel great distances, often crossing state lines and making it difficult for other states to meet and maintain the air quality standards for ozone that EPA establishes to protect public health.

By reducing ozone exposure, the proposal would provide annual benefits of $700 million to $1.2 billion in 2017, far outweighing the estimated costs of $93 million. The proposal will provide climate-related co-benefits, estimated at around $23 million per year. For every dollar invested through the proposed CSAPR Update Rule, American families would see up to $13 in health benefits.

These emission reductions would also improve visibility in national and state parks, and increase protection for sensitive ecosystems including Adirondack lakes and Appalachian streams, coastal waters and estuaries, and forests.

The CSAPR, which was finalized in 2011, was designed to help states meet the 1997 ozone standards. Now that the CSAPR approach to define upwind state obligations under the “good neighbor provision” has been affirmed by the Supreme Court, the EPA is applying this approach to the 2008 ozone NAAQS to help states address transported ozone pollution problems under the strengthened standards. This proposal also responds to the July 2015 decision of the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and addresses the court’s concerns regarding ozone season NOx emissions budgets for 11 states.

EPA will accept comments for 45 days after publication in the Federal Register and will hold a public hearing on December 17, 2015 in Washington, DC.

More information:

Why Many States Are Panicked by the Federal Clean Power Plan

Read the full story in Stateline.

Many states with significant reserves of coal, oil and natural gas depend on revenue from severance taxes on natural resources. In 2013, Montana’s tax revenue from severance taxes was nearly 12 percent. In West Virginia it was 13 percent and in Wyoming it was 39 percent, according a Stateline analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data.

No wonder those states are so upset about federal Clean Power Plan regulations, President Obama’s bid to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases affecting the Earth’s climate. The regulations, which take effect in December, will require states to reduce emissions from power plants. Coal emits more greenhouse gases than other energy sources, so one way for states to meet the federal goal is to shut down coal-fired plants.